Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Print ISSN: 2393-9079

Online ISSN: 2393-9087

CODEN : IJPPTK

Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (IJPP) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award programs. With more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

44-49


Authors Details

Kajalben Jashubhai Katariya*, Tushar Gosai, Akshay Hasmukhbhai Parmar


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 620

PDF Downloaded: 395


Cost-effective analysis of enalapril, amlodipine, and enalapril plus amlodipine combination in newly diagnosed patients of hypertension: A pharmacoeconomic comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of drugs


Original Article

Author Details : Kajalben Jashubhai Katariya*, Tushar Gosai, Akshay Hasmukhbhai Parmar

Volume : 11, Issue : 1, Year : 2024

Article Page : 44-49

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.008



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Background: Hypertension (HTN) is a chronic condition with severe complications, so early detection and effective management are essential to prevent cardiovascular events and reduce the associated economic burden. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of enalapril, amlodipine, and their combination in terms of blood pressure reduction, considering overall efficacy and economic implications.
Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in 150 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients who were prescribed either enalapril (5 mg), amlodipine (5 mg), or enalapril plus amlodipine (2.5 mg each). The primary outcome was the difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between baseline and follow-up, as well as the evaluation of overall efficacy and cost. Based on the data, statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests for drug efficacy, and cost-effectiveness was compared using MS Excel.
Results: After 30 days, all treatments significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.0001). The combination therapy with a lower dose showed superior efficacy in blood pressure reduction and was most cost-effective, requiring less expense for a 1 mmHg reduction in blood pressure compared to individual drugs with a higher dose. Quality of life assessment favored low-dose combination therapy, with fewer reported adverse effects.
The combinationof amlodipine and enalapril at a lower dose demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness, efficacy in blood pressure reduction, and a favorable impact on patients' quality of life compared to individual drugs at a higher dose. This suggests that combination therapy may be a preferred option in the management of hypertension, emphasizing the importance of considering both clinical and economic factors in treatment decisions.


Keywords: Cost-effective analysis, Enalapril, Amlodipine, Hypertension, Quality of life


How to cite : Katariya K J, Gosai T, Parmar A H, Cost-effective analysis of enalapril, amlodipine, and enalapril plus amlodipine combination in newly diagnosed patients of hypertension: A pharmacoeconomic comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of drugs. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol 2024;11(1):44-49

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.