Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Print ISSN: 2393-9079

Online ISSN: 2393-9087

CODEN : IJPPTK

Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (IJPP) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award programs. With more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 502

PDF Downloaded: 270


Get Permission Bhonsle, Vyas, Vyas, Ramchandani, and Hemwani: Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of uropathogens causing urinary tract infection among pregnant women in Ujjain M.P. (India)


Introduction

Urinary tract infection is one of the most prevalent medical problem found in pregnant women during pregnancy and occurs due to physiological, hormonal and morphological changes in the genitourinary tract at pregnancy period.1 Urinary tract infection is common disorder caused by bacteria in pregnant women, if it is not treated timely and appropriately then it causes serious complications and adversely affect the health of both mother and fetus.2 UTI’s during pregnancy reported as major health problem worldwide. The prevalence of UTI in pregnant women is higher as compared to non pregnant women, about 20% of pregnant women having UTI and hospitalized in obstetrical wards.3 UTI’s are second most common complication in pregnant women after anemia.4 Pregnant women are more susceptible for UTI due to their anatomy of urinogenital system, short length of urethra and contamination of urinary tract with fecal flora. During pregnancy urinary tract infection classified into two categories asymptomatic and symptomatic. In asymptomatic UTI, lower urinary tract involved, it is most common during pregnancy due to anatomical and physiological changes while in symptomatic UTI, upper urinary tract is involved and it is most common cause of predelivery due to acute pyelonephrities. The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women is 6.2% and symptomatic bacteriuria is 1-18%.5 The incidence of UTI increases with pregnancy, it starts with the 6th week of pregnancy and reaches its pick level at 22nd to 24th week of pregnancy due to increased volume of bladder, dilation of urethra and expanded ureter.6 During pregnancy pressure of gravid uterus on ureters obstruct the urine flow and causes humoral and immunological changes and increases the risk of UTI.5 The increase level of glucose in urine changes the composition of urine which promote the growth of bacteria and increases the chances of UTI.6 The risk factors associated with UTI in pregnant women are increasing age, parity, gravity, past history of UTI, anemia, number of sexual activity, individual hygiene, lack of awareness, socioeconomic status, functional abnormalities of urinary tract and diabetes Urinary tract infections are more frequently caused by gram negative bacteria than gram positive bacteria.7 The major gram negative bacteria includes E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, Citrobacter while in gram positive bacteria S. aureus, S. saprophyticus, E. faecalis and Streptococcus species.1, 8 The management of UTI can be done by effective medical treatment and proper identification of uropathogenic bacteria causing UTI and their susceptibility.1

Material and Methods

This study was carried out in SRL Laboratory, Ujjain for one-year period starting from November 2018 to October 2019 to find out prevalence of common uropathogenic bacteria causing UTI, their frequency, prevalence their antibiotic susceptibility pattern in pregnant women. The samples were collected from different hospitals of Ujjain (M.P.) were received in SRL laboratory and processed.

The urine samples were collected from pregnant women having suspected symptoms of UTI. By giving proper instructions, the midstream urine sample was collected in sterile container aseptically and after labeling, it was stored in refrigerator at 4oC until used to avoid contamination.

After collecting urine samples physical examination of urine sample was done for observing volume, pH, color, odor and turbidity of sample then wet mount was prepared for detection of pus cells, epithelial cells, cast, R.B.Cs and bacteria.

After examination, the urine sample (0.001 ml) of collected urine was inoculated on Blood agar, MacConkey agar and Chrome agar plate by streak plate method and incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. After incubation, colonies were counted. For confirmation of isolated uropathogen, the isolated colonies were further identified by morphological, microscopic and biochemical tests as per the standard procedures.9

Antibiotic susceptibility test

Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed using Kirby-Bauer Disc Diffusion method as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for determination of susceptibility of uropathogens causing UTI against antimicrobial agents. The antibiotic susceptibility test was performed using Mueller-Hinton agar plates for this inoculum of selected bacterial colony was prepared in peptone broth and incubated at 37oC for 2 hours and its turbidity was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards and spread on Muller Hinton Agar by sterile swab using lawn method.10 A sterile forceps was used to transfer commercially available antibiotic Himedia disc on this lawn and plate was incubated at 37oC for 24-48 hours. After incubation, size of zone of inhibition was measured to differentiate between resistant and sensitive isolates of bacteria, according to CLSI guidelines.11

Results

The total number of examined pregnant women was 120 among them 78 pregnant women having UTI and prevalence rate of UTI was 65% (Table 1)

Table 1

Prevalence of UTI in pregnant women.

S. No.

Total Number of pregnant women

Number of pregnant women having UTI

Prevalence of UTI (%)

1.

120

78

65%

The relation of UTI with different age group in pregnant women is calculated and the results shows that higher incidence of UTI was seen in age group of 25-30 year and it was (47.4%) which was followed by the age group of < 25 years (35.8%) and > 35 years (16.6%) (Table 2).

Table 2

Relation of UTI with different age groups of pregnant women.

S. No.

Age (years)

Pregnant women (%)

1.

< 25 years

35.8

2.

25-30 years

47.4

3.

> 35 years

16.6

The Prevalence of UTI in pregnant women based on gravidity is shown in Table 3. The results shows that maximum cases of UTI are found in primary gravida that was (52.5%) which was followed by secondary gravida, its occurrence was (28.2%), and comparatively less occurrence was recorded in multigravida, which was (19.2%). The results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Prevalence of UTI in pregnant women in relation to gravidity

S. No.

Gravidity

Pregnant women (%)

1.

Primary gravida

52.5

2.

Secondary gravida

28.2

3.

Multigravida

19.2

The prevalence of UTI concern with trimester of pregnancy regarding gestational age was also studied and its incidence in drimester 3rd, 2nd and 1st were 48.7%, 34.6% and 16.6% respectively. The results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Prevalence of UTI in pregnant women in relation to gestational age.

S. No.

Gestational age

Pregnant women (%)

1.

1st trimester

16.6

2.

2nd trimester

34.6

3.

3rd trimester

48.7

Frequency of isolated uropathogenic bacteria   

In this study, six different uropathogenic bacteria were isolated and identified from pregnant women. The majority of the isolates of gram negative were high as compared to gram positive isolates. E. coli was found to be the most frequently isolated predominant uropathogen (41.0%), followed by K. pneumoniae (23.0%), S. aureus (14.1%), P. aeruginosa (11.5%) and E. faecalis (10.2%) (Figure 1).

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern

Gram negative bacteria showed a high level of sensitivity against Doripenem, Meropenem, Amikacin, Gentamicin and Nitrofurantoin and highest resistance against Ampicillin, Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid, Ciprofloxacin and Norfloxacin while Gram positive bacteria showed highest sensitivity to Teicoplanin and Nitrofurantoin and highly resistant to Penicillin. E. coli isolates were showing highest sensitivity to Doripenem (93.7%), Meropenem (90.6%), Amikacin (65.6%), Nitrofurantoin (62.5%) and Gentamicin (59.3%) while they were showing higher resistance towards Ampicillin (87.5%). Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid (78.1%), Ciprofloxacin (84.3%), Norfloxacin (81.2%) and Ceftazidime (75.0%).

Figure 1

Frequency of different uropathogens causing UTI in pregnant women.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/72734ec9-8deb-4525-a5b8-444621e300a1image1.png

Table 5

Antibiotics susceptibility of uropathogens during study

S. No.

Name of antibiotics and concentration

Antibiotic susceptibility

U1 (32)

U2 (18)

U3 (09)

U4 (11)

U5 (08)

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

S

R

1.

Amikacin (30 mcg)

21 (65.6)

11 (34.3)

13 (72.2)

05 (27.2)

05 (55.5)

04 (44.4)

07 (63.6)

04 (36.3)

NA

NA

2.

Gentamicin (10 mcg)

19 (59.3)

13 (40.6)

11 (61.1)

07 (38.8)

04 (44.4)

05 (55.5)

06 (54.5)

05 (45.4)

NA

NA

3.

Ampicillin (10mcg)

04 (12.5)

28 (87.5)

02 (11.1)

16 (88.8)

06 (66.6)

03 (33.3)

04 (36.3)

07 (63.6)

03 (37.5)

05 (62.5)

4.

Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (20/10mcg)

07 (21.8)

25 (78.1)

04 (22.2)

14 (77.7)

NA

NA

05 (45.5)

06 (54.5)

NA

NA

5.

Ciprofloxacin (5mcg)

05 (18.7)

27 (84.3)

03 (16.6)

15 (83.3)

02 (22.2)

07 (77.7)

09 (81.8)

02 (18.8)

04 (50.0)

04 (50.0)

6.

Norfloxacin (10 mcg)

06 (40.0)

26 (81.7)

05 (27.7)

13 (72.2)

04 (44.4)

05 (55.5)

08 (72.7)

03 (27.2)

06 (75.0)

02 (25.0)

7.

Nitrofurantoin (300 mcg)

20 (62.5)

12 (37.5)

13 (72.2)

05 (27.7)

05 (55.5)

04 (44.4)

07 (63.6

04 (36.3)

05 (62.5)

03 (37.5)

8.

Ceftazidime (30mcg)

08 (25.0)

24 (75.0)

06 (33.3)

12 (66.6)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

9.

Meropenem (10mcg)

29 (90.6)

03 (9.3)

16 (88.8)

02 (11.1)

07 (77.7)

02 (22.2)

NA

NA

NA

NA

10.

Doripenem (10mcg)

30 (93.7)

02 (6.2)

17 (94.4)

03 (16.6)

08 (88.8)

01 (11.1)

NA

NA

NA

NA

11.

Penicillin (10mcg)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

01 (9.0)

10 (90.9)

03 (37.5)

05 (62.5)

12.

Teicoplanin (30mcg)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

09 (81.8)

02 (18.1)

07 (87.5)

01 (12.5)

[i] U1:, E. coli, U2: K. pneumoniae, U3: P. aeruginosa,U4: S. aureus, U5: E. faecalis

[ii] R: Resistant, S: Sensitive, NA: Notapplicable.

[iii] *Values in columns show number of cultures while values in parenthesis show percentage of cultures resistant to antibiotic.

Figure 2

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of uropathogenic isolates.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/16fea281-a319-46e9-8244-b23ce86ed5a2/image/51f20687-7ed6-48b7-a5fb-9adc5088d66c-uimage.png

Figure 3

Antibiotic resistance pattern of uropathogenic isolates.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/72734ec9-8deb-4525-a5b8-444621e300a1image2.png

Similar antibiotic susceptibility pattern were also shown by other gram negative isolates. Gram positive S. aureus and E. faecalis were highly susceptible to Teicoplanin and their sensitivity was (81.8%) and (87.5%) respectively while both S. aureus and E. faecalis was highly resistant to Penicillin and their resistance was (90.9%) and (62.5%) respectively. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of different isolates are shown in Table 5.

Discussion

UTI is most common disorder in pregnant women and become a serious problem worldwide. In this study prevalence of UTI in pregnant women was 65% these resembles with the study done in Iraq by Mamoryi and Salman in 2019,12 they were found 64.6% prevalence while in other study done in Libya by Tamalli et al in 2013 reported 30% prevalence of UTI.13 Beside this low prevalence were recorded in India and Ethiopia and it was only 7.7% and 9.5% respectively.14, 15 The variation in prevalence might be due to the difference in sample size and geographical conditions. The majority of UTI cases among pregnant women observed in age group of 25-30 years but previous study Ranjan et al found higher incidence in age less than 25 years in 2017 while Ayoyi et al reported higher cases of UTI in age of more than 35 years.5, 16 The risk of UTI may increases with increase in maternal age. According to previous studies, multigravida is major risk factor for developing bacteriuria in pregnant women but in current study highest incidence of UTI was seen in primary gravida (52.5%) and lowest incidence in multigravida (19.2%). The higher prevalence of UTI found in third trimester followed by second trimester and first trimester, it was accordance with the study done by Ranjan et al.5 The increased incidence of UTI in third trimester may be due to mechanical obstruction due to enlarge uterus. The most prevalent bacterial pathogen was E.coli (41.0%) followed by K. pneumoniae (23.0%), P. aeruginosa (11.5%), S. aureus (14.1%) and E. faecalis (10.2%). The most prevalent isolated uropathogen identified in this study was E. coli, which is in accordance with studies conducted in Ethiopia and India.7, 17 The major factor responsible for higher frequency of E. coli in pregnant women is urine stasis in pregnancy, which promotes the growth and colonization of bacteria. Majority of the isolated uropathogens were found to be highly sensitive for Doripenem, Meropenem and Imipenem while resistant for Ampicillin and Penicillin. These results of antibiotic susceptibility were similar to the study done by Trupthi gowda and Rajni in India17 and Tula et al in Ethiopia.7 Thus, emergence of resistant isolates is due to improper use of antibiotics without consulting with physician.

Conclusion

The overall prevalence of UTI among pregnant women in Ujjain is very high. The most prevalent and dominant causative agent of UTI was E. coli. The most effective antibiotic for treatment of UTI is Carbapenems and Nitrofurantoin. The antibiotic should be prescribed carefully; they may not cause any side effect in pregnant women during treatment. The screening of UTI in pregnant women during pregnancy will improve the quality of prenatal care and reduce the risk of complications during pregnancy.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

S Gaur V Shama I Ahamad U Farooq S Singh S S Sharma Study on the bacteriological causes of UTI in Pregnant Women and their Current Resistance PatternJ Cardiovasc Dis Res2022132120510.31838/jcdr.2022.13.02.20

2 

N Amarasinghe Bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of adult lower respiratory infection in ColomboJ Health Soc Sci2018132736

3 

B I Rudri M Deepthi M Dharmavijaya Prevalence of urinary tract infection in antenatal period at tertiary care hospital in rural BangloreInt J Clin Obstetr Gynaecol2018246981

4 

M Amiri Prevalence of urinary tract infection among pregnant women and its complications in their newborn during birth in the hospitals of Defzul cityIran Red Crescent Med J20151782694610.5812/ircmj.26946

5 

A Ranjan Prevalence of UTI among Pregnant Women and its Complications in NewbornIndian J Pharm2017101459

6 

M S Jahromi A Mure C S Gomez UTIs in patients with neurogenic bladderCurr Urol Rep2014159433510.1007/s11934-014-0433-2

7 

A Tula A Mikru T Alemayehu B Dobo Bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care at a tertiary care hospital in southern Ethiopia. CanJ Infect Dis Med MIcrbiol20201910.1155/2020/5321276

8 

S Thakur K M Nagpal Urinary tract infection in Pregnant Women at KathmanduNepal202039454810.15520/mcrr.v3i9.143

9 

J G Collee R S Miles B Watt Test for identification of bacteria1996433

10 

A W Bauer W Kirby J C Sherris M Turck Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk methodAm J Clin Pathol19664544936

11 

S James Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing372019507

12 

M M Mamoryi A A Salman Prevalence of symptomatic urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in Iraqui pregnant women of Babylon GovernorateJ Babylon2019161512

13 

M Tamalli M A Bioprabhu Urinary tract infection during pregnancy at Al-khoms, LibyaInt J Med Med Sci20136117

14 

P P Shazia S V Reddy R Rao M V Janardan Uropathogens and their drug susceptibility patterns among pregnant women in a teaching hospitalAnn Biol Res20112551621

15 

T Demilie S Beyene S Melaku W Tsegaye Urinary bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility among pregnant women in North West EthiopiaEthiopian J Health Sci20122221218

16 

A O Ayoyi G Kikuvi C Bii K S Prevalence aetiology and antibiotic sensitivity profile of asymptomatic bacteriuria isolates from pregnant women in selected antenatal clinic from Nairobi, Kenya. The Pan AfiMed J20172641112

17 

T Gowda M Rajini Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and its Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns among Pregnant Women in a Tertiary Care CenterJ Med Sci Health2021713842



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

91-95


Authors Details

Kaina Bhonsle, Alka Vyas, Harish Vyas, Abhiraj Ramchandani, Kirti Hemwani


Article History

Received : 18-06-2022

Accepted : 25-06-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files